Home
About Us
Advertise
Printable version
Selecting SharePoint team members
By Eric Riz
July 24, 2012 —
(Page 1 of 3)
Creating a project team can be the most important and challenging component of your SharePoint implementation. Your team members can make or break your entire project. How do you ensure that you have chosen the right project manager? What about the developers? Do you choose someone based on industry knowledge, business knowledge or SharePoint knowledge? What if they have two of the three qualities, or worse yet, none of three?
As a consulting firm focused on SharePoint deployments and doing it “right,” we get asked by many clients what the “right way” is to select project team members. This article is being written to address some of those questions that occur during the on-boarding of project team members. For this reason, we ensure that reviewing and vetting the project team members is a part of each discovery we do as an organization. There are two elements to take into consideration: What is the skill-set of the individual, and what does the project
need
in order to succeed?
Let’s start off discussing the optimal team structure for a SharePoint project implementation. Like any project, you will have team members at various levels, some which are known by the business and employees, others which may not be. For example, not everyone is aware of the true definition of a “stakeholder,” and therefore become confused about who is and who is not a stakeholder on a project. My definition of a project stakeholder is, in fact, anyone who is involved in the project, from project manager to end user, senior management to developer—everyone!
This point is debated by some, who feel that the term stakeholder should only be used at an executive level. The fact is that I’m comfortable using whichever definition is agreed to; however, a simple inclusion of “senior” as the prefix to “stakeholder” will solve the issue before it begins. This being the case, the SharePoint team structure that I recommend is at three levels: stakeholders, core team, and extended team.
Next Page
Pages
1
2
3
Share this link:
https://sptechweb.com/link/36823
Related Articles
Customizing SharePoint Online Using SharePoint Designer, Part 1
Once you get a handle on SharePoint Online, the question becomes: How can I modify it to suit my needs. First of two parts.
NewsGator announces Social Sites 3.0 and SharePoint 2013 Compatibility
Lookout interface provides innovative way to tame, consume and interact with information deluge in social business networks
SharePoint-Videos rolls out on-demand training
VisualSP is an in-context, on-demand help system that gets to the point of what end users need
Add comment
Name*
Email*
Country
United States
Canada
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua & Barbuda
Antilles, Netherlands
Arabia, Saudi
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas, The
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote D'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor (Timor-Leste)
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Guiana
French Polynesia
Gabon
Gambia, the
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guinea, Equatorial
Guyana
Haiti
Holland (see Netherlands)
Honduras
Hong Kong, (China)
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea (North)
Korea (South)
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macao, (China)
Macedonia, TFYR
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia, Federated States of
Moldova, Republic of
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
Northern Mariana Islands
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestinian Territory
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Reunion
Romania
Russia (Russian Federation)
Rwanda
Saint Helena
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia & Montenegro
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syrian Arab Republic
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania, United Republic of
Thailand
Timor-Leste (East Timor)
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad & Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks and Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City State (Holy See)
Venezuela
VietNam
Virgin Islands, British
Virgin Islands, U.S.
Wallis and Futuna
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zanzibar
Zimbabwe
[Not specified]
Compose