06/20/2012 02:04:06 PM EST
While his commentary is interesting and honest, the "freely available" information he references is covered by a non-disclosure agreement that participants in Microsoft's preview program must agree to be bound to be in the program. Based on some limited reading I've done of Bjorn's material, he has made it clear he does not believe he or those from whom he may get his information are bound by that agreement. Apparently, he has a different understanding of what it means to give your word to be bound by rules of good conduct. He's made clear that he doesn't appreciate MS need for the NDA, but should we then condone what he does and pay to subscribe to information he publishes on the beta because he doesn't agree with it.
United StatesPaul
06/20/2012 02:31:10 PM EST
Only problem is, it probably won't be called SharePoint 2013 :)
United StatesAnonymous