Home
About Us
Advertise
Printable version
Painting the lines of governance
By Eric Riz
January 29, 2013 —
(Page 2 of 3)
Now, let’s bring this back to a SharePoint context, specifically around site creation, location and taxonomy. Your organization needs the same foundation as the parking lot: asphalt on the ground, painted lines, and expectations and policies in place to ensure compliance when each site is created. I’m limiting this article to site creation only; future articles will address things like a governance plan and how it is to be created and implemented across an organization.
For a site to be created, the underpinnings and high-level architecture will have taken place. In the parking lot, this was the foundation that made sure the site was graded, leveled and filled with asphalt. I can extrapolate further to include things like the mix or type of asphalt, which company was used to pour it, the procurement process, whether it was competitively bid on, and so on. This is the foundation that ensures that sites for different business units are created appropriately and within the appropriate areas.
When defining your sites and site collections, decisions have to be made similarly to the parking lot. How many sites and sub-sites (parking spots) will you allow? What is the size of each? Will they be created from the same master page and template (painted lines)? What process will be followed to request that a site is made, and how will access be granted and governed?
Now that you have some theoretical sites created, how will you set policies and expectations for their use? This is the compliance component, where the meter man comes into the picture. In an office environment, it is rare that someone volunteers for that position as the whistleblower who walks around ensuring that rules are followed. My advice here is two-fold: First, there is an argument that, if your governance has been created with the right policies and procedures, compliance should be straightforward and for the most part not necessary at the whistleblower level. Having someone point and click through your top-level sites once a week or month should be sufficient.
Next Page
Pages
1
2
3
Share this link:
https://sptechweb.com/link/37349
Related Articles
Axceler unveils governance for Yammer and new dashboard for multi-platform collaboration governance
Axceler today announced two new products to their portfolio
MetaVis to preview new SharePoint governance tool at SharePoint Conference 2012
MetaVis Informant for SharePoint helps companies know their data by analyzing content and enforcing compliance
Axceler’s new ControlPoint allows enterprises to centrally implement global governance policies
ControlPoint increases usability with iPad support and a wizard-like interface
Add comment
Name*
Email*
Country
United States
Canada
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua & Barbuda
Antilles, Netherlands
Arabia, Saudi
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas, The
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote D'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor (Timor-Leste)
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Guiana
French Polynesia
Gabon
Gambia, the
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guinea, Equatorial
Guyana
Haiti
Holland (see Netherlands)
Honduras
Hong Kong, (China)
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea (North)
Korea (South)
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macao, (China)
Macedonia, TFYR
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia, Federated States of
Moldova, Republic of
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
Northern Mariana Islands
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestinian Territory
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Reunion
Romania
Russia (Russian Federation)
Rwanda
Saint Helena
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia & Montenegro
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syrian Arab Republic
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania, United Republic of
Thailand
Timor-Leste (East Timor)
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad & Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks and Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City State (Holy See)
Venezuela
VietNam
Virgin Islands, British
Virgin Islands, U.S.
Wallis and Futuna
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zanzibar
Zimbabwe
[Not specified]
Compose