Home
About Us
Advertise
Printable version
Writing the right requirements — Part I
By Eric Riz
November 23, 2011 —
(Page 1 of 2)
Have you ever wondered why SharePoint requirements are so difficult to create when engaging a business or project team? When an individual creates a wish list for a product or service, the list is typically short, sweet and to the point. However, when a team gets together, and people begin to discuss their collective needs, the same list becomes exhaustive and difficult to navigate.
At the end of that effort, the Project Manager is left with a convoluted mess of both needs and wants, while the end product still seems months (or longer) away from the pending reality that is the implementation and effective use of SharePoint.
As Project Manager, the first question to ask when defining SharePoint requirements is what initial functionality is needed to increase efficiencies. The Project Manager must explain to his or her project team and end users that SharePoint is not just a “thing” or “system”; rather, it is a collection of products, and it must be viewed by the business in the same way it views Microsoft Office.
Simply stating that the business “needs” document management is the same as saying the business needs Microsoft Word, a simple statement with a huge impact. What is the maturity of the business? What systems are currently in use? How is information being stored? How will you retrain end users?
In any requirements effort, it’s important to provide an appropriate amount of consulting, training and explanation in order to equip the business with the SharePoint knowledge to make the necessary requirements decisions. Henry Ford famously said, “If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said a faster horse.” Before cars became a universal form of transportation, horses were the accepted method—it was the frame of reference people could articulate. To put that into the SharePoint context, if you don’t see the vision of SharePoint and understand what its capabilities are, how can you define your requirements?
Here are some steps to get your SharePoint requirements written right!
Next Page
Pages
1
2
Share this link:
https://sptechweb.com/link/36132
Related Articles
Writing the right requirements — Part III
Getting your requirements in understandable and actionable statements is a critical step toward implementation
Writing the right requirements — Part II
In this installment, Eric Riz explains how to get the most input from everyone involved in the SharePoint deployment
A lesser-known Web Part connection option
Selecting data from one Web Part can automatically perform an action on the data in a connected Web Part
Add comment
Name*
Email*
Country
United States
Canada
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua & Barbuda
Antilles, Netherlands
Arabia, Saudi
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas, The
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote D'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor (Timor-Leste)
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Guiana
French Polynesia
Gabon
Gambia, the
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guinea, Equatorial
Guyana
Haiti
Holland (see Netherlands)
Honduras
Hong Kong, (China)
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea (North)
Korea (South)
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macao, (China)
Macedonia, TFYR
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia, Federated States of
Moldova, Republic of
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar (ex-Burma)
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
Northern Mariana Islands
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestinian Territory
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Reunion
Romania
Russia (Russian Federation)
Rwanda
Saint Helena
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia & Montenegro
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka (ex-Ceilan)
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syrian Arab Republic
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania, United Republic of
Thailand
Timor-Leste (East Timor)
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad & Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks and Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City State (Holy See)
Venezuela
VietNam
Virgin Islands, British
Virgin Islands, U.S.
Wallis and Futuna
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zanzibar
Zimbabwe
[Not specified]
Compose